| The alcohol content of unfortified wines is  increasing worldwide. Some experts suggest winemakers now need to seriously consider  limiting or reducing the levels in wine, raising the question of how to achieve  moderate alcohol levels, writes Rajiv Seth. Robert Parker publisher of The Wine Advocate,  wrote about big,  plummy high-alcohol red  wines with “gobs of fruit,” encouraging California winemakers to go for higher  and higher alcohol levels. Some labels now list 17 percent, which may actually  be a degree or higher in the bottle -- closer to Port than wine.  In  fact, the federal US Laws only labels wines between 7 percent and 14 percent  alcohol as “table wine.” Above that, even if the level of alcohol is reached  naturally, they are categorized as “fortified” and, with some leeway, are taxed  at a rate four times higher.  While  higher alcohol rates do occur naturally in warmer climates, winemakers can  boost the level by letting the grapes hang longer to achieve phenolic ripeness  and build up sugars that ferment into alcohol. The result is wines with a  richer, slightly sweeter flavor that do well in competitions, where deep color  and big aromas count. American wine writer Gerry Dawes said in an interview “If you want to  get drunk, booze is cheaper and quicker than wine,” High alcohol destroys the  balance, wine should have. You need acid, not high alcohol, to go with food.  After a single glass these wines are tiresome to drink and people will leave a  very expensive bottle half-empty on the table because they can’t finish it. The  trend toward high alcohol wines is generally blamed on Robert Parker.  Considered the most influential wine writer, he developed the industry standard  100-point system for evaluating wine. Since Robert Parker tends to reward high  alcohol wines, especially red wines, with high scores, winemakers responded by  making wines with higher alcohol content and now more and more restaurants are  adding these wines to their wine lists. Most  people don't know that the alcohol content of wines can have a huge impact on  their wine cellar. Unfortunately, bottles of wine with an alcohol content of  more than 15% won't last in storage. The acid in these wines, which is the  single most important element contributing to the longevity of a wine, simply  won't last. In US,  rising alcohol levels have appeared despite winemaker efforts to keep them low.  The dirty little secret of California wine is that a great deal of it goes  through some form of de-alcoholization, where at least part of each vintage has  alcohol removed to bring down the overall level. Another  approach is to “just add water” to the fermenting must to literally water down  the potential alcohol. California vintner calls this secret technique “adding  Jesus units” because water is turned into wine instantly, and it is a common  practice, if not one that anybody admits using. All this  leads to one question- are winemakers feeling pressured to make high-alcohol  wines because those are the wines which get high ratings on 100-point scales,  then why would these winemakers find themselves forced to de-alcoholize wines  or even simply dilute? South  African wine writer Michael Fridjhon once commented “we all want our wines to  deliver on taste, and we all wish to avoid the kick of the mule”   Experts  point out that a good wine ought to be between 11 and 12% of alcohol. Below  this the wine runs the risk of being weak and small, unless it is particularly  rich in aroma. Above that it is hot and too heady, its higher alcoholic content  making it difficult to drink in reasonable quantities.  Paul Pontallier of Château Margaux stated that wines from all over the  world now have excess alcohol, “because of warmer climates, but also because of  late harvesting, greater leaf clearing and other viticultural practices  commonly used now days.” Reasons  for moderate alcohol It can be argued that moderate alcohol is  desirable in wines. Some of these reasons relate to health, legal limits on  alcohol, food with which alcohol is paired, and stylistic aims of the wine  producer. Several interventions are possible during  the winemaking process, after the grapes have been harvested.  The most significant determinant of final  alcohol level is the amount of sugars in the must. However, it is still  possible to significantly tweak the final alcohol levels in the winery. In the  case of de alcoholisation treatments, it is possible to achieve any desired  level of reduction of alcohol, but even less drastic interventions can have  significant influence. Some processes are outside the regulations  and laws governing winemaking, depending on the jurisdiction. These include  watering, using excess water in processing, and various types of reverse  osmosis. Two main interventions exist for direct manipulation of the alcohol  level in the winery. Sugar can be removed from the must prior to fermentation,  or alcohol can be removed after fermentation is complete. Water addition  is illegal in many jurisdictions around the world, specifically in South Africa, the EU,  Australia and New Zealand. In contrast, water addition is allowed in the USA. Even the more restrictive state  legislation in California has been reinterpreted to allow water addition. It has been suggested that winemakers are routinely  instructing grape growers in California to leave grapes on the vine to  dehydrate and adding water in the winery to compensate, a process sometimes  known as “humidification” or “breaking back” (Robinson 2003). In 2005 Andrew  wrote that “much of the wine output” of theCalifornian wine industry is “watered back.
 The regulations in the EU only allow the sale of wine for  human consumption if it has undergone practices that are permitted in the EU,  unless covered by separate agreement. Since none of the agreements covering  wines from outside the EU permit addition of water, it appears that it is  illegal to sell wine in the EU that has undergone such treatment. If routine  water addition leads to a perception by consumers that winemaking is just  another industrial process, this could depress profit margins throughout the  wine industry. It therefore seems to be more of a long term threat than an  opportunity. - Rajiv Seth  Rajiv Seth is a wine educationist, Author and an expert in International  Wine Legislation especially European Union. He is an expert in advising winery  Laboratory set up and has written a number of manuals for Lab assistants of  wineries. In1987, he became the first Indian to be awarded a gold medal from  WSET, London.  He also writes for DelWine. Contact him at royalcellar@yahoo.co.in.
 The views expressed by the author are his own and not  necessarily that of delWine-editor. |